From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 17 11:34: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA3937B422 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2000 11:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8HIXl609033; Sun, 17 Sep 2000 11:33:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Bill Fumerola Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: In summary.. [Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 release on September 25th] In-Reply-To: Message from Bill Fumerola of "Sun, 17 Sep 2000 10:05:35 EDT." <20000917100534.O47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 11:33:47 -0700 Message-ID: <9028.969215627@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Watch your cc line, boofoo; you just cc'd -stable TWICE] > This doesn't negate Garance's excellent description of how PRs [don't] > work for general purpose / non-maintainer submissions. I didn't say it negated anything, I simply said that in this particular case, it's down to those two developers. As to how and why PRs don't work, that's kind of a pointless argument until/unless someone has something better to suggest. Nobody likes the PR database and has cursed it since almost the first week of its adoption, but the whole singing-and-dancing keystone replacement project never left the ground. Ahem. > the system for whatever reason, we should be taking a serious look at > just giving him maintainership of lpr so he can apply his umpteen new You know how the proposal-for-committers process works. Go for it. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message