From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 09:12:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C795E37B401 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop016.verizon.net (pop016pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE09343F93 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:12:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([129.44.60.214]) by pop016.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030602161245.YQCG3199.pop016.verizon.net@mac.com> for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:12:45 -0500 Message-ID: <3EDB7783.9060901@mac.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 12:12:51 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <87smqsone9.fsf@penthesilea.fte.local> <3EDB43FB.3000100@thebigchoice.com> In-Reply-To: <3EDB43FB.3000100@thebigchoice.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.75.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop016.verizon.net from [129.44.60.214] at Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:12:44 -0500 Subject: Re: REPLY: Please Confirm Lockergnome's Tech Specialist Subscription X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 16:12:47 -0000 Matt Heath wrote: > Frank Tegtmeyer wrote: [ ... ] >> Time to set the list to subscribers only? > > how would that help? > > it would be trivial to write an auto "subscribe, post spam, unsubscribe" > bot That's trivial only if the spammer can read the submission verification email. Which is certainly possible via an account that's been owned, but this tends to leave more traces and might alert the legitimate user that something's going on. -- -Chuck