From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 19 04:43:58 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA17001 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 04:43:58 -0700 Received: from cabri.obs-besancon.fr (cabri.obs-besancon.fr [193.52.184.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id EAA16992 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 04:43:36 -0700 Received: by cabri.obs-besancon.fr (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C) id AA19713; Wed, 19 Apr 95 13:42:26 +0100 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 95 13:42:26 +0100 From: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr (Jean-Marc Zucconi) Message-Id: <9504191242.AA19713@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> To: nate@trout.sri.mt.net Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199504190402.WAA01767@trout.sri.MT.net> (message from Nate Williams on Tue, 18 Apr 1995 22:02:28 -0600) Subject: Re: proposed change to ld.so X-Mailer: Emacs Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Nate" == Nate Williams writes: > [ Cascade changes to ld.so ] >> "critical" may be exagerated, but this is the only way to get nTk >> working. (nTk is a perl interface to Tk 4.0) > Forgive my ignorance, but wouldn't it be better to use TkPerl with Perl > 5.0, since that appears to be used and supported? Then again, it may > suffer the same symptoms. (I ask because I'm interested in building GUI > Perl apps, and Perl5 w/TkPerl seems to offer the best merge of new > technology with a supported product. TkPerl is no more supported. The author has no time to work on it. People are now switching to nTk. Seems to be the new way to go. In addition, all I got with TkPerl is core dumps :-( > Nate Jean-Marc. ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ Jean-Marc Zucconi | jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr Observatoire de Besancon | F 25010 Besancon cedex | PGP Key: finger jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr =========================================================================