From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Tue Apr 18 16:58:31 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6EBD443FC
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2211354
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id AE8F8D443FA; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE251D443F9;
 Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 903CC1353;
 Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354)
 id A545D1E69; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:58:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>
To: qjail1 <qjail1@a1poweruser.com>
Cc: "ports\@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org>,
 FreeBSD questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Is pkg quarterly  really needed?
References: <58F61A8D.1030309@a1poweruser.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:58:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <58F61A8D.1030309@a1poweruser.com> (qjail1@a1poweruser.com's
 message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:54:21 -0400")
Message-ID: <y3ux-bqku-wny@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:58:31 -0000

qjail1 <qjail1@a1poweruser.com> writes:

> I maintain a port and I have users complaining that the pkg system
> takes many months before the updated version of my port shows up in
> the pkg system.

Better ask committer assigned to your bug to add MFH tag or send an
email to ports-secteam@ (and CC portmgr@) which commit to backport.
For leaf ports such requests are unlikely to be declined, just keep
in mind risks due to using old dependencies and possible regressions.