Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:34:22 -0500
From:      Nathan Williams <nathanw@nils.lib.il.us>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, Nathan Williams <nathanw@nils.lib.il.us>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   RE: Pulse poll at Borland
Message-ID:  <3073B3378589D411B21600508BAF32AA012349@EXCHANGE>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So, did you vote?

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Brett Glass [SMTP:brett@lariat.org]
> Sent:	Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:56 PM
> To:	Nathan Williams; chat@FreeBSD.ORG; advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject:	Re: Pulse poll at Borland
> 
> Borland has a long history of ignoring all but the #1 platform in any
> niche -- a strategy which has caused them serious problems more than
> once. Their support of Windows to the exclusion of all other OSes in
> the 90's made them dependent on Microsoft and practically destroyed
> the company.
> 
> When I asked them, at the February LinuxWorld, if they'd be supporting
> FreeBSD, the marketing droid at the booth asked me (I kid you not)
> "Which distribution of Linux is that? I've never heard of it."
> 
> The sad part is that their booth was about two aisles away from
> the Walnut Creek/BSDi booth. I don't even think they "got it" when
> the 10-foot-high daemon walked by.
> 
> When I posted messages on their site's message boards asking politely
> about support for the BSDs, they simply did not respond. This despite
> the fact that Borland language manager Simon Thornhill claims that
> "Borland does not have a platform agenda." (Odd, then, that they
> support so few platforms!)
> 
> In short, Borland needs a serious wake-up call. 
> 
> A *lot* of people will have to respond to that poll before they even
> consider any of the BSDs, and if we're not #1 (or, at best, #2) they
> simply won't do it. So folks had better vote early and often.
> 
> This is a company that up to this point has had little foresight and 
> does not have any sense of the value of diversification. I hope they 
> will change. I'm not holding my breath, though, as they have been so 
> dense for all of these years. 
> 
> --Brett Glass
> 
> At 11:05 AM 9/26/2000, Nathan Williams wrote:
>   
> >I'm not sure if anyone has alerted this group yet, so I'm sorry if this
> is a
> >repeat.  Borland is conducting a developer's poll at
> >http://community.borland.com addressing which OS to add support to for
> C++
> >Builder and Delphi.  Currently FreeBSD is 4th, but could easily pull of
> >second place if we could get a few more votes in.  Nobody knows how much
> >cred Borland puts into these surveys, but this is a great and essential
> >opportunity for the FreeBSD community to express their interest in
> corporate
> >support for FreeBSD applications.  So, VOTE goddamnit.  
> >Nathan Williams
> >nathanw@nils.lib.il.us
> >P.S.  Before voting you will need to fill out a very short registration
> >form, no biggy so don't let it discourage you from making your voice
> heard. 
> >
> >
> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3073B3378589D411B21600508BAF32AA012349>