From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  6 19:18:36 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C44106564A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 19:18:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.160.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97E38FC1C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 19:18:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so175131pwi.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=+NLBUqwjXrBnZSYeoXGQdLtf3ZkYyKFEU/GVbuye4TY=;
	b=qPvT83nmcgyjM6Xnxf65YcjeHtvx0CG1GzGx2kmInwkBXniwxcmpTXPMHruHKgFYGn
	z1F7iXG1jMtQFUCtKwN0ZNCrryXY0s9+jz1kcdMCqu5t7NnN/RUfJAblpR6JLXRMzaW0
	OlsFkh2IbEzb3zb059xkW3rRxAidSkLKyykuc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.15.67 with SMTP id v3mr3198321pbc.5.1309979915391; Wed, 06
	Jul 2011 12:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.64.200 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110706162811.GA68436@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <4E1421D9.7080808@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<CALH631=F4bSgNDE4w0qcXGMgGxZRRwCP9n-H4M0c+1UEaqWr7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E147F54.40908@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
	<20110706162811.GA68436@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:18:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CACqU3MVLr5VXRovs1uV+zHazJi2rrjE9Sp3XzsCPJ0Un06pmDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	"O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>,
	arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:18:36 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
<sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>> I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
>> better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
>> back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler.
>>
>
> If you are using MPI in numerical codes, then you want
> to use SCHED_4BSD. =A0I've posted numerous times about ULE
> and its very poor performance when using MPI.
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-October/026375.ht=
ml
>
[sarcasm]
It is rather funny to see that the post you point out has generated
exactly 0 meaningful follow-up then and as you mention later in this
thread, the issue still remains today :-)
[/sarcasm]

 - Arnaud