From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 23 08:53:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 815) id 9EC4416A4CF; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:53:36 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:53:36 +0000 From: Murray Stokely To: Marc Fonvieille Message-ID: <20040823085336.GC78296@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200408230644.i7N6iVKx061706@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040823084716.GA88989@abigail.blackend.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040823084716.GA88989@abigail.blackend.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:53:36 -0000 On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:47:16AM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > Add a few tags around KerberosIV inside titles. > > > > Previously, Kerberos5 was printed in bold in the table of contents > > while KerberosIV was not. > > > > I understand the reason of the change: consistency. > However I wonder if it's a good idea to use application tags in titles. > For the moment only few applications inside titles are tagged and, of > course, the TOC is not really consistent on this point. > Any opinion? I just added : (element (title application) (process-children)) to my local stylesheet because I think that the bold application names look poor in the titles -- this just overrides the freebsd.dsl bold setting for when it is inside a . I also think that <command>s look better in italics than the small monospaced font we used when they show up in titles. - Murray