From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 29 16:15:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409B837B422 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 16:15:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) id f4TNFOu31573; Tue, 29 May 2001 16:15:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 16:15:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200105292315.f4TNFOu31573@earth.backplane.com> To: Seth Cc: Vivek Khera , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: adding "noschg" to ssh and friends References: <15124.4635.887375.682204@onceler.kciLink.com> <20010529145609.A1209@xor.obsecurity.org> <15124.7132.963202.560009@onceler.kciLink.com> <200105292211.f4TMBpB30316@earth.backplane.com> <20010529183239.B14308@psychotic.aberrant.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :Can we agree that it (that is, securelevel > 0 and schg on selected binaries) :raises the bar a bit higher? If so, it seems to me that it might be worth :doing (though most appropriately on a user-by-user basis). : :Seth. Putting on my security hat... no. All you are doing is forcing the hacker to use some more obscure and possibly less detectable way to compromise the machine. So, in fact, you could be making the problem *worse*. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message