Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:42:51 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) Message-ID: <4FF9FEDB.5050602@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FF9ECB5.5090507@FreeBSD.org> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <4FF9ECB5.5090507@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/08/2012 13:25, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> On 2012.07.08. 1:17, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Other than authoritative DNS, what features does unbound lack that you
>> want?
> [Picking up a random mail from the thread.]
>
> Other than the functionality, when we replace something, it is also
> important to do some benchmarks and assure that the performance is not
> reasonably worse.
Agreed, and while I have no concerns in that regard, I leave the actual
benchmarking in Dag-Erling's capable hands. :)
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FF9FEDB.5050602>