Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:42:19 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: luigi@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk scheduling (was: Re: RFC: adding 'proxy' nodes to provider ports (with patch)) Message-ID: <43415.1237801339@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:51:29 %2B0100." <eb21ef440903220251m67700679r7fe6662f9081e910@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <eb21ef440903220251m67700679r7fe6662f9081e910@mail.gmail.com>, Luigi Rizzo writes: >>>Scheduling was just an example on where the problem came out, >> >> Scheduling is the *only* application I have seen mentioned for >> this special case geom construct ? > >man 4 geom has a section which explicitly mentions this construct, >with the same example that you posted in the thread: You will notice that there is no mention of "special classes" or "proxy nodes with special properties". If you want to do it, do it right. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43415.1237801339>