From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 22 21:53:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AA216A4C0 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from procyon.firepipe.net (procyon.firepipe.net [198.78.66.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0E243FE5 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:53:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by procyon.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 339DA21853; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:53:29 -0700 From: Will Andrews To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030923045328.GF47671@procyon.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org References: <3F6FCD7E.4070301@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F6FCD7E.4070301@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 04:53:31 -0000 On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:35:10PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: [...] Scott said it all for me. Seriously. The whole idea of breaking backwards & de-facto compatibility is bad, bad, bad. Regards, -- wca