From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 00:18:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9A216A4CE for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:18:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCC943D45 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:18:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:22:13 -0500 Message-ID: <412FCF53.90703@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:18:27 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Chen References: <20040827233321.GA40204@grimoire.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20040827233321.GA40204@grimoire.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Aug 2004 00:22:14.0102 (UTC) FILETIME=[1145CF60:01C48C95] cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Earthlink Abuse Bounces X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:18:39 -0000 Jonathan Chen wrote: >Anyone notice that any email abuse reports to abuse@earthlink.net will >immediately bounce back with a message that basically says that: > > "It's not from us, don't bother us" > > No; but it's hardly surprising. Perhaps you should set your subject line to "Acquisition Proposal", sign your mail "Steve Balmer*, MSFT**" and route it though mailb.microsoft.com ... I guess the real question is, "does anybody care about the end-user" these days ... and the answer probably is, "yes --- the billing department". Kevin Kinsey *any resemblance to real persons or entities that have more "l"'s in their name is somewhat purely accidental ... **"Must Shackle Free Trade" or something like that, so I've heard...