Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 16:01:44 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> Cc: Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com>, freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-base and poudriere Message-ID: <20200406130144.GG8012@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <98f5a68c-90d1-1f9f-4199-aed87d6aabc3@madpilot.net> References: <8c4f0ffe-6961-f119-0034-0becf860b616@gjunka.com> <d07d49a6-740f-25f1-f3ba-4d43d6162f1a@madpilot.net> <649a0a62-1ae4-6ec8-308a-4dadc234126a@gjunka.com> <98f5a68c-90d1-1f9f-4199-aed87d6aabc3@madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 12:59:13PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-pkgbase wrote: > On 06/04/20 11:56, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > > > On 06/04/2020 09:42, Guido Falsi wrote: > >> On 06/04/20 11:24, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > >>> Is it possible to create a poudriere jail using FreeBSD-base packages? > >>> > >>> I am thinking about a scenario where I build kernel/world and base > >>> packages on the host, then create a poudriere jail to build packages on > >>> the exact same kernel/world that was build on the host. > >> I'm doing a similar thing on head. What I do is run normal svn up; make > >> buildworld; make buildkernel; make packages on the poudriere machine. I > >> the upgrade that machine with the new base packages. > >> > >> After that I perform: > >> > >> poudriere jail -j ${j} -u -t 359154 > >> > >> where 359154 is the subversion revision I have just compiled in /usr/src. > >> > >> So I get packages for that exact head revision. > >> > >> Hope this answers your question. > >> > >> BTW I have found no way to create a jail with a fixed svn revision from > >> the get go. When I need to do that, I resort to temporarily modifying > >> poudriere code at jail.sh:563, adding -r <rev> option. I then revert the > >> change. > >> > > > > Thanks, that's interesting. So, poudriere will build the jail from > > sources from that specific revision? > > Yes, since it will "svn up -r <rev>" it's source tree for that jail. > > It will also invalidate and remove all packages if __FreeBSD_version has > changed. > > > > > But I think it still won't solve the problem where the base packages > > have been build with modified kernel configuration. Can you supply a > > custom kernel configuration in your method? > > No I can't, but really a modified kernel configuration should not impact > on ports, do you have a specific scenario? > > At most ports interact with kernel sources, whatever the configuration. NOINET6 don't change __FreeBSD_version but affect all inet-related modules, for example.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200406130144.GG8012>