Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Aug 2008 02:35:58 +0900
From:      Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Lilleengen <lulf@FreeBSD.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>, Stefan, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, OutBackdingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>, Ulf
Subject:   Re: ZFS patches.
Message-ID:  <20080807023558.39ca4ffa.nork@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200808051328.18308.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <20080727125413.GG1345@garage.freebsd.pl> <20080731013229.9d342ee5.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080806004557.6e538e5c.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200808051328.18308.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:28:17 -0400
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 11:45:57 am Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:32:29 +0900
> > Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > > > However, this feature is a bit undocumented yet, and it didn't work 
> correctly
> > > > for me. But you can always test it out.
> > > 	I'm using zfsboot on my note PC, and not using UFS.  I know many
> > > 	problems about it:-).
> > > 	1. zpool configuration is too limited, only single and mirror
> > > 	   usable.  If you want to zfsboot, you can't use RAIDZ, striping
> > > 	   and cache(zpool add ... cache ...):-(.
> > 	I missed.  zfsboot is disregarded zpool cache rather than supports it.

	Grrr my broken English! "rather than doesn't support it."...

> > > 	SEE ALSO:
> > > 	http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2008-July/004895.html
> > > 	http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/125878
> > 	I found some zfsboot issues, please apply following patches:
> > 	1. zfsboot2 (boot2) doesn't %d (printf), so change %d to %u.

	Grrr my broken English! "doesn't support %d(printf)"...

> > +#define SPA_VERSION_6			6ULL
> FYI, style(9) prefers '#define<tab>' to '#define<space>'.  Keeping with the 
> existing style would likely shorten the diffs.

	Yes, thanks for your pointed out.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080807023558.39ca4ffa.nork>