From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sun May 17 17:05:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBF02DE3F9; Sun, 17 May 2020 17:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Q7mz188mz4XtT; Sun, 17 May 2020 17:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:To:In-Reply-To:Cc:References:Message-Id:Date: Mime-Version:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aERx51TYaJV+dpSyqEI32mRf+Og69lyxNqz9XJ2JICU=; b=d89vzWglY+k/z2wHxM3lhROOvi gQHoS6vImycVwJUx4yrqO+0WvxKbhm9jWW5+1uWnJa8BEiC2rh5Lm46p2XmU5umFebWNhuGK2SnBf UiZqpvn08Tdc+044UeU8a2LbgnS2Y7H5YBGNdLHdei2ItLVYbLtCb8iABv4yT9+4rIRo=; Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaMim-0002VL-0d; Sun, 17 May 2020 11:05:04 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jaMil-0004wG-2p; Sun, 17 May 2020 11:05:03 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7898160F73; Sun, 17 May 2020 11:05:02 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id gYi4QYSt79aW; Sun, 17 May 2020 11:05:02 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.145] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99853160E81; Sun, 17 May 2020 11:05:02 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Rebecca Cran Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 11:05:01 -0600 Message-Id: <67E7A602-1A21-4FBA-A9BF-6D7C0271D09C@bsdio.com> References: Cc: Marcelo Araujo , Rebecca Cran , ports-committers , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: To: Gerald Pfeifer X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E262) X-XM-SPF: eid=1jaMil-0004wG-2p; ; ; mid=<67E7A602-1A21-4FBA-A9BF-6D7C0271D09C@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in02.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.67; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XMGappySubj_01,XMSubLong, XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4998] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: ; sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Gerald Pfeifer X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 719 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 10 (1.3%), b_tie_ro: 8 (1.1%), parse: 1.10 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (1.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.77 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.9 (0.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.51 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.08 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 207 (28.8%), check_bayes: 205 (28.5%), b_tokenize: 6 (0.8%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (0.8%), b_comp_prob: 2.1 (0.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 188 (26.1%), b_finish: 0.98 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 454 (63.2%), check_dkim_signature: 0.74 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 69 (9.6%), poll_dns_idle: 61 (8.4%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.3%), tests_pri_500: 24 (3.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: svn commit: r499851 - in head/sysutils: . uefi-edk2-bhyve-devel uefi-edk2-bhyve-devel/files X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49Q7mz188mz4XtT X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=d89vzWgl; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com designates 166.70.13.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.08 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdio.com:s=xmission]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[166.70.13.231:from]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.52.16.57:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdio.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.978]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[166.70.13.231:from] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 17:05:07 -0000 > On May 17, 2020, at 3:24 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >=20 > I understand Rebecca has helped with this, too? Do the two of you think=20= > we can remove the dependency on USE_GCC=3D4.8 in the next month or two? I=E2=80=99m hoping so: I have a newer version of the UEFI firmware I=E2=80=99= ve been working on, and I=E2=80=99ve spent some time updating the CSM code. I= =E2=80=99m currently stuck, and will spend more time in the next couple of w= eeks on it to try and get further along.=20 The main firmware builds with any recent version of gcc, but the CSM still n= eeds gcc 4.8. I plan to debug just why building with newer versions causes a= triple fault when switching to real mode and hopefully find a fix! =E2=80=94=20 Rebecca Cran=