From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 10 11:00:22 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517E0106566B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl)
Received: from smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net
	[212.54.42.167])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096A68FC1A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [212.54.42.134] (helo=smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net)
	by smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dick@nagual.nl>) id 1RkYfc-0005so-Cn
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:11:08 +0100
Received: from 524944af.cm-4-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([82.73.68.175]
	helo=mail.nagual.nl)
	by smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dick@nagual.nl>) id 1RkYfc-0000OD-5D
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:11:08 +0100
Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by yanta (Axigen)
	with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 1092B7;
	Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:14:58 +0100
Message-ID: <4F0C0EBC.3010401@nagual.nl>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:11:08 +0100
From: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:9.0)
	Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <CAJxePNJcTh0QZfr_YOLwN-R1nOrdJETxgMPPm78S35MAsipsug@mail.gmail.com>
	<aef8c5199b6d01d3fc5d21ac120574a7.squirrel@pop.pknet.net>
	<CAJxePN+GKorAeHCh0HRfUqwAOJ-x+_xtPiHk_XDuRAmJWYdgoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BC7F244A-3393-4BB6-97A7-F7C32C6FD34F@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <BC7F244A-3393-4BB6-97A7-F7C32C6FD34F@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4
X-Ziggo-spambar: ++
X-Ziggo-spamscore: 2.8
X-Ziggo-spamreport: BAYES_40=-0.001, CM_META_TB_NOARR=0.5,
	FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.665, HELO_MISC_IP=0.001, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.657,
	RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982
X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Flag: No
Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:00:22 -0000

Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
> The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled package you got used.  While many people want PHP in the form of an Apache module, other folks use it via fastcgi and so forth...
Yes that might be so. But it's far better to *have* this module and 
disable it in Apache than not have it at all and for that reason only 
*buiild* apache from ports in stead of using a package.