From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 15:19:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6DB1065694 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from srandall52@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6F78FC1A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so24988gxk.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:19:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=F6eTMcXnpb+SyL+FAaBRTY6aZMk+Jd4aZV1/q5rm1sM=; b=sdbKCwnT7ciJkXphR6J2AcVZIsWOWY3CrYprQssiVm8kk4le65glqqyd9/ah6pX6iG C/tQYpxRz1GOkfxk/bWxD3oLrVMgzrYCbaK+Z8jvqfzwXltNAAZDPFavMmbYa3DuLskL MMU3yp3YAoJ/gTnr6/zftc5AKhbKC5mcnAvUA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Fz6aiPiooUjhcSXLNhGsic4UsVH8b7wcFNwOteexSga2FOkLc0Hncb/85z0fWe42x6 dcfPGrh0LJDBVo8MkhJt2jI6PI/I8URVxYhSioSBBXEjKY1b31Jr06U8lbrM2lfZcOh1 yhdO+7ZWf+Oo4Q+jxNe1xTZukJyWQNs6G1fq4= Received: by 10.151.11.17 with SMTP id o17mr5322873ybi.258.1296659019014; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:03:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from locust.local (adsl-68-88-175-232.dsl.wchtks.swbell.net [68.88.175.232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v4sm3448438ybe.5.2011.02.02.07.03.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:03:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:03:29 -0600 From: Steve Randall To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110202090329.7ee4a4ab@locust.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20110202153805.40db05f8@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:19:22 -0000 On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > 2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko : > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100 > > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> Hi all > >> > >> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here: > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or > >> http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice > >> > >> Can you please test it? > >> > >> by default it builds without java. it only lacks kde and gnome > >> integration. (sorry but my poor CPU already hates enough :)) > >> > >> All languages supported are build. > >> > >> I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a > >> pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3h30 > >> with java) > >> > >> at this points : > >> there is (I guess) only one remaining problem : > >> which launching libreoffice it can't find it libraries, I haven't > >> decided yet wether to add LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the wrapper script or to > >> add ldconfig -m ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib and ldconfig -m > >> ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/base3.3/program > >> > >> maybe it conflicts with openoffice I haven't checked yet. > >> > >> to test it you will need a fresh ports tree (the needed libtextcat > >> modification was committed yesterday thanks thierry@) > >> > >> the mandatory screenshot : > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice-3.3.0-final.png > >> > >> I expect to be able to push it in the tree during next week (after > >> finding a good way to deal with the libraries and checked if it > >> conflicts with openoffice) > >> > >> I would like to thanks Robert Nagy from openbsd, he has made all the > >> hard work :), he was also very helpful. > >> > > > > Thanks for work! I second that. > > > > I have one comment: > > > > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xI libreo > > libreoffice-3.3.0 =C2=A0 Full integrated office productivity suite > > > > now I'm trying `pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0` but got errors: > > > > tiger# pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0 > > tar: lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No > > such file or directory > > tar: > > lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/deploymentfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No > > such file or directory > > > > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xL libreo |grep basprovfx.uno.so > > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so > > > > [tiger@tiger]~%file /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprov= fx.uno.so > > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: cannot > > open `/usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so' (No > > such file or directory) > > > > tiger# find work/ -type f -name basprovfx.uno.so > > tiger# pwd > > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice > > > > broken pkg-plist ? > > > >> regards, > >> Bapt > > > > -- > > wbr, tiger > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >=20 > seems like but I really don't know how to figure out what you have or > have not in your box that prevent basprovfx.uno.so and consors to be > built Have you tried building on i386? It looks like you generated the packing list on amd64. I'm not sure if that explains basprovfx.uno.so, but it's definitely a problem.