From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 5 21:16:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA07652 for current-outgoing; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 21:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA07647 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 21:16:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA12589; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 21:16:18 -0800 (PST) To: Nate Williams cc: regnauld@tetard.glou.eu.org (Philippe Regnauld), freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2-BETA comments In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Jan 1997 20:35:11 MST." <199701060335.UAA18789@rocky.mt.sri.com> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 1997 21:16:18 -0800 Message-ID: <12585.852527778@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > In the meantime, I *could* revert all of the kbdio and such changes from > 2.2 if you think it would help. Whaddya think Jordan? That depends on how long you think it might take you to fix it. :-) I'm all in favor of forward progress, and certainly prefer it to retrograde motion, but you know our 2.2 release schedule as well as anyone and are closer to the problem, so... What do *you* want to do, Nate? :-) Jordan