From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 3 10:15:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F55110656C3 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93378FC21 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2446D41C; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:15:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B8AEC844B9; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:15:22 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: spellberg_robert References: <200905281030.n4SAUXdA046386@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <200905280904.44025.kirk@strauser.com> <20090528183801.82b36bbb.freebsd@edvax.de> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793EDE2@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793EDE6@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <4A1EF742.7030606@otenet.gr> <4A2041ED.4010003@telenix.org> <4A218A98.4@telenix.org> <20090531201553.3aac4b82@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4A257D2D.9030803@emailrob.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:15:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4A257D2D.9030803@emailrob.com> (spellberg robert's message of "Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:27:41 +0100") Message-ID: <86eiu1ei85.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: fbsd_chat Subject: Re: [ fbsd_chat ] Re: What is this forum for? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:15:24 -0000 spellberg_robert writes: > notwithstanding your use of a "smiley_face", > as far as i am concerned, > on any mailing_list or other communications forum accessible by childre= n, > such language is "verboten". This has nothing to do with children. It is simply a matter of politeness. > one of the several unimpeachable benefits of > the american "motion picture production code administration", > a/k/a "the hays office" [ after william hays ] or > "the breen office" [ after joseph breen ], > was that all films were viewable by children. Only by US standards. What do you think hurts a child more: to see a woman's breast or hear the word "fuck", or to see cowboys and indians (or their modern equivalent) disembowel each other? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no