From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 00:07:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C94316A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de [62.245.232.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72FD43D2D for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:07:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from current@schmalzbauer.de) Received: from bsdharry (firewall.zenk.de [212.14.84.243]) i3R77BZw026990 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:07:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from current@schmalzbauer.de) From: Harald Schmalzbauer To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:06:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 X-Name: Zenk Gesellschaft fuer Systemberatung m.b.H. X-Address: Schaeufeleinstrasse 1 X-Location: 80686 Muenchen X-Country: Germany X-Phone: +49 (0) 89 5468490 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-UID: 3241 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_OagjAA6xvrDz5aQ"; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404270906.54407.current@schmalzbauer.de> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mailjail.dmz.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de Subject: More than 8 labels per slice X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 07:07:15 -0000 --Boundary-02=_OagjAA6xvrDz5aQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Dear coders, is there any chance that FreeBSD can adopt the OpenBSD changes reagrding UF= S=20 labels? I'm using one label per jail and this old 8 label limit forces me t= o=20 use different slices which sometimes, when I have to change label sizes, is= a=20 big handicap. Having 16 labels would improove the jail-handling greatly IMHO. Having 32=20 labels (like I think NetBSD) was even greater, but lifting the 8 label limi= t=20 would suffice I think. Thank you in advance, =2DHarry --Boundary-02=_OagjAA6xvrDz5aQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAjgaOBylq0S4AzzwRAnyBAJwOFldu2J0AvPocT4lYtlLTEd+a/ACffdnE q9lhhTLkGJ3anTKQwJAnaig= =cNQE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_OagjAA6xvrDz5aQ--