From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 17 21:33:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DCA106564A; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net (eastrmmtao102.cox.net [68.230.240.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8568FC1A; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090717213302.FRHC14603.eastrmmtao102.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net>; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:33:02 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.103.37.153]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id H9Z11c00C3JFCbG029Z1hV; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:33:02 -0400 X-VR-Score: -200.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=zaSRAjxZvK4A:10 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=PVrTJv2s-MbzVBLfBf4A:9 a=qgAPrpA4T4qDIrfqnNuCsjPdAsAA:4 a=twX6zS2zVsUA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:34:12 -0500 To: "Erwin Lansing" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090717090530.GS60681@droso.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.64 (Linux) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" Subject: Re: [HEADSUP]: Ports freeze schedule for 8.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:33:03 -0000 On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:40:43 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello all, > > It will be great if I can get more people to help test with > libtool/libltdl 2.2 before the freeze. It already has been tested in By the way, the test is what I meant by runtime not build. I have tested it with GNOME 2.26 and 2.27, KDE 3, KDE 4, XFCE 4 and many other WMs before I put in MC CVS ports-stable. Also, a few other applications. All of those work fine. But... I prefer different people to do the test that they might ran into problem that I haven't catch. It would be great if someone can test www/apache20 and www/apache22. Maybe there is no issue, since all patches are similar in and take from apache SVN. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org