From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  5 06:42:04 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1498E16A4CE; Tue,  5 Oct 2004 06:42:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F2DAD43D2F; Tue,  5 Oct 2004 06:42:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i956eJQB002215;
	Tue, 5 Oct 2004 00:40:19 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:41:54 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20041005.004154.60195591.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: scottl@freebsd.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <416231CE.4060505@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20041005052916.87869.qmail@web21427.mail.yahoo.com>
	<416231CE.4060505@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: mjacob44@yahoo.com
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam cam_periph.h cam_xpt.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 06:42:04 -0000

In message: <416231CE.4060505@FreeBSD.org>
            Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Matthew Jacob wrote:
: > It's unclear it will 'never' be needed. How should I implement IP over
: > FC? 
: 
: Feel free to bring back camnet if you need it.  It had sat unused for,
: oh, 6 years ;-)

We certainly don't need an extra SWI hanging out reguardless :-)

Warner