Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:10:37 +0200
From:      Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com>
To:        Florent Peterschmitt <fpeterscom@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: x11/Terminal - why not xfce4-terminal
Message-ID:  <CAHcdu2oMW-OYZ_K6VC0HXafa2vZbap_6_5ERpv9umSL-VF8c2Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5063118C.9080404@gmail.com>
References:  <50630E95.1060400@gmail.com> <20120926152651.3ea916ce@laptop> <5063118C.9080404@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/9/26 Florent Peterschmitt <fpeterscom@gmail.com>:
> Le 26/09/2012 12:26, Sergey V. Dyatko a =E9crit :
>
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:17:57 +0000
>> Florent Peterschmitt<fpeterscom@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Why the terminal emulator from XFCE4 is called Terminal instead of
>>> xfce4-terminal ?
>>
>> http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/terminal
>>
>>
>>
> Ok, then next question. Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory call=
ed
> xfce (or xfce4 if versionning becomes important) ?
>

What do you mean by =AB Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory
called xfce =BB ?



--=20
olivier



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHcdu2oMW-OYZ_K6VC0HXafa2vZbap_6_5ERpv9umSL-VF8c2Q>