From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jun 28 10:51:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495DB37B5E2; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:51:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm016-032.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.82.240]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA32502; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:48:24 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3B46318C6; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:46:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:46:14 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: John Baldwin Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , papowell@astart.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: was: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20000628134614.I8602@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <2991.962038326@localhost> <200006270941.CAA00983@john.baldwin.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200006270941.CAA00983@john.baldwin.cx>; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 02:41:27AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 02:41:27AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > Erm, then why not do this with apsfilter? Because apsfilter also brings in far more useless junk that LPRng does. 26,000 lines over our current lpr == LPRng. apsfilter == LPRng + lots and lots and lots of other crap. In any case, I think it was agreed that we are not going to import LPRng without a BSD license. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message