From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 1 00:15:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A70537B401; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:15:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-104-32.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4682943FCB; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:15:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6813566B9B; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5AD0CB77; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 00:15:29 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andreas Klemm Message-ID: <20030701071529.GA73969@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200306301752.h5UHqVi3087902@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030630212144.GB71572@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030701051725.GA32426@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030701051725.GA32426@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/amsn distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 07:15:33 -0000 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 07:17:25AM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > Sometimes things go wrong, excuse me. > Or is now any problem left ??? Sorry for my strongly-worded email: when I looked at the referenced PR I misread and thought it was referring to a rerolled distfile instead of the second half of an earlier commit. We've had several committers lately who haven't followed procedure when chasing rerolled distfiles, and I jumped the gun this time. In the future I'll try and avoid sending accusatory emails before my morning coffee has kicked in :-) Kris --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/ATUQWry0BWjoQKURApS9AKC+qxK/VYCagw7HpGm7+wZXbQF9zACgvxcT 739zLiSn/8D5hNom+9AlnqE= =XGvq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--