Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:35:24 +0400
From:      Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: fflush() on readonly files
Message-ID:  <20040619133524.GA72030@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040619132924.GA71908@nagual.pp.ru>
References:  <20040609154040.GA26229@asura.bsd> <20040610021356.GA4990@VARK.homeunix.com> <20040610025439.GA11655@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040619095642.GA67130@sanatana.dharma> <20040619105938.GA69596@nagual.pp.ru> <20040619120149.GA64515@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040619130718.GA71593@nagual.pp.ru> <20040619132924.GA71908@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 05:29:24PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > > There is no reason to change from the perfectly correct & well-documented
> > > behaviour BSD has had for 10-15 years. The original poster's example provides
> > > a good argument for this: it detects application bugs.
> > 
> > I agree.

Moreover, I agree that it is incorrect (i.e. beyond of standard scope) 
assumption from program side, but what the fix you suggest? There is no 
_standard_ way to detect by given FILE * pointer is it R or W, there is no 
such standard stdio macro.

-- 
Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040619133524.GA72030>