From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 14 09:09:41 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA22531 for current-outgoing; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 09:09:41 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA22512 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 09:09:34 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id JAA28800; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 09:09:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id JAA00421; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 09:07:50 -0800 Message-Id: <199511141707.JAA00421@corbin.Root.COM> To: Terry Lambert cc: hsu@cs.hut.fi, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISP state their FreeBSD concerns In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Nov 95 09:19:45 MST." <199511141619.JAA20025@phaeton.artisoft.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 09:07:15 -0800 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >have you attempted to verify this by replacing the Adaptec controllers >with, say, NCR in a similar environment? No. "Experimenting" is not an option here since I have to get on a plane, stay in hotels, etc, to make changes like that. >Sequencer code written in the face of manufacturer opposition simply >does not give me the warm fuzzies (no slight on the Adaptec driver >intended -- though if you want to view it as a slight on Adaptec, feel >free to do so 8-)). Adaptec does not oppose us providing our own sequencer code. -DG