From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 28 6:34:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.vnet.net (smtp1.vnet.net [166.82.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155C914A0B for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 06:34:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp1.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA26205; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:35:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA40383; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:33:37 -0500 (EST) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.2/8.6.9) id JAA02354; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:33:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:33:38 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199903281433.JAA02354@lakes.dignus.com> To: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: another ufs panic.. In-Reply-To: <199903281420.AAA18161@cheops.anu.edu.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > I never realised ufs was so bad on freebsd...I experienced another > panic whilst using pax to copy one fs to another (was already 90% there > on the destination due to the crash from dump/restore). > > ...there have been substantial ufs improvements in 3.x, yes ? > > darren > I wasn't aware ufs is "so bad" on freebsd... perhaps you are experiencing hardware problems? If you'd provide more details - machine specifics, type of panic, traceback, etc... we can likely narrow this down. - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message