From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 20:35:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4159106566B for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2548FC14 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E2F046B23; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:35:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:35:47 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4C8D234F.40204@quip.cz> Message-ID: References: <4C8D234F.40204@quip.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs OpenSolaris vs Nexenta ZFS Benchmarks X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:35:47 -0000 On Sun, 12 Sep 2010, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I am sending this link to those interested in poor performance results of > FreeNAS (FreeBSD) and ZFS. > > http://www.zfsbuild.com/2010/09/10/freenas-vs-opensolaris-zfs-benchmarks/ Ouch :-). In general, not my area, so I'll leave it to the ZFS folks, but I will comment that there's an InfiniBand project in flight -- Jeff Roberson's work on this can be found in Subversion. I'm not sure what his schedule is, and presumably, there will be ZFS integration work to do even once the base InfiniBand stack is done. Robert