From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar  6 08:37:04 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2E46116A4CE; Sun,  6 Mar 2005 08:37:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [193.30.224.136])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 769C043D1D; Sun,  6 Mar 2005 08:37:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mat@mat.cc)
Received: from cc-171.int.t-online.fr (unknown [213.44.125.171])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8C7A2404F;
	Sun,  6 Mar 2005 09:37:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 09:36:57 +0100
From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>
To: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@neva.vlink.ru>,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <1DE178D508C1D70D1B5F9E87@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87mzth18e2.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
	<20050305151903.GC26240@hub.freebsd.org>
	<87mzth18e2.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 08:41:54 +0000
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 08:37:04 -0000

+-le 06/03/2005 11:33 +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov =E9crivait :
|>>>>> "Kris" =3D=3D Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
| BTW, from man mount_nullfs:
|=20
| BUGS
|      THIS FILE SYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T
| WORK)      AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM.  USE AT
|      YOUR OWN RISK.  BEWARE OF DOG.  SLIPPERY WHEN WET.
|=20
| So you can't suggest to use nullfs instead of unionfs, because "is
| well-documented to be broken".

Well, nullfs and unionfs have the same BUGS section :-)
OTOH, nullfs has never panic'ed me, whereas unionfs has.

--=20
Mathieu Arnold