Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 07:25:47 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: bin/98349 [Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ipfw ipfw2.c] Message-ID: <200606020725.54959.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200606020517.k525HHLU037819@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200606020517.k525HHLU037819@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2677489.p0n7p1EQ2n
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Friday 02 June 2006 07:17, Max Laier wrote:
> mlaier 2006-06-02 05:17:17 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> sbin/ipfw ipfw2.c
> Log:
> Print dynamic rules for IPv6 as well.
>
> PR: bin/98349
> Submitted by: Mark Andrews
> MFC after: 2 weeks
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.90 +15 -5 src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c
It's highly confusing that we have {src,dst}_{ip,port} in host byte order=20
while {src,dst}_ip6 are in network byte order. I think that keeping networ=
k=20
byte order in the kernel and doing flipping in userland where needed would =
be=20
beneficial. It should also be possible to unify IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in=
=20
an union, sockaddr_storage or the like.
Anyone looking for a fun project to tackle? ;)
=2D-=20
/"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
--nextPart2677489.p0n7p1EQ2n
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBEf8viXyyEoT62BG0RAiZjAJ0TW01019oydaxL6U0+2SRI0uHtuACaA0++
2wucCAITNO/aaDsmUg/9Qmo=
=4jOZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2677489.p0n7p1EQ2n--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606020725.54959.max>