Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:17:09 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3=BCsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de> To: Euan Thoms <euan@potensol.com> Cc: Walter Schwarzenfeld <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/sope: make (stage-qa) now fails with DEVELOPER=yes complaining about iconv dependency Message-ID: <A54D23F5-ABDB-48F9-B7E6-72EF3DA13DFA@waschbuesch.de> In-Reply-To: <7c8b-57880400-7-6b8b4580@127157238> References: <7c8b-57880400-7-6b8b4580@127157238>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 14.07.2016 um 23:29 schrieb Euan Thoms <euan@potensol.com>: >=20 >=20 > On Friday, July 15, 2016 01:11 SGT, Walter Schwarzenfeld = <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at> wrote:=20 >=20 >> I think this statements should be only warnings. Cause not all of = these=20 >> statements are right and each maintianer should decide which "USES" = or=20 >> "LIB_DEPENDS" are necessairely and which not. >=20 > Well, I don't know enough to comment about whether it should be = classed as a warning or an error. But there's definetely a bug in the = ports Mk system, since adding USES+=3Diconv does not remove the error. I = don't think I even need iconv as a dependency, it should be included = lower down in the dependency tree. I am not sure about this. At the very least, sope-core does use iconv in = its NGExtensions (e.g. NSString+Encoding.m). Can we really assume some lower dependency package already pulls iconv = in?=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A54D23F5-ABDB-48F9-B7E6-72EF3DA13DFA>