From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 4 17:19:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B218106564A for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris.torek@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22918FC08 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1241836gwb.13 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:19:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Rx+ol3CKG4Gul+fFfistVBovI2G0zQEaxNuomRjf3xk=; b=EYDL2EZD57VNi+D3ALDOosOqHkgzXS+Gm+1u55yCSUFZkQcDpgpRvNJB2FlgA36SU0 3nyhCFNhlR0R5K+5jXvixY2j54UhguKeqmC9TtE6sJYhXU483BM6ZcYEZ+/DDlxBCQ8I Orsci/skFLmCEnrNUvmABCKHmgE5MhQa/lVH0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.65.9 with SMTP id n9mr2196098yba.177.1312478354961; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.8.6 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:19:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 11:19:14 -0600 Message-ID: From: Chris Torek To: Christian Weisgerber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PackageKit apparently depends on lzma X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:19:16 -0000 On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > This doesn't make sense. archivers/lzma doesn't even install a > library. I agree that it doesn't make sense ... and yet, it would not build until I did that. However, I updated all ports (removing the archivers/lzma one along the way) and it built fine afterward, without any extra dependencies. (I also rebuilt the base system library and xz.) So of course now I can't reproduce the problem. (some OTHER things were more problematic ... :-) the new samba does not build against the new talloc lib) Chris