From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 8 14:20:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720EED6F for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@vangyzen.net) Received: from aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com (aussmtpmrkpc120.us.dell.com [143.166.82.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A812263A for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:20:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Loopcount0: from 64.238.244.148 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,839,1367989200"; d="scan'208,217";a="39384111" Message-ID: <5203A90D.6020008@vangyzen.net> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:19:57 -0500 From: Eric van Gyzen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130702 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: J David Subject: Re: unexpected idprio 31 behavior on 9.2-BETA2 and 9.2-RC1 References: <1375737316.96778.10.camel@firkin.mischler.com> <520116DE.8030305@vangyzen.net> <52013992.4050101@vangyzen.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, dave@mischler.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:20:05 -0000 On 08/06/2013 14:23, J David wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote: >>> on an otherwise idle amd64 system with 4 CPUs. The first command in the >>> build.log file: >>> >>> rm -rf /usr/obj/home/freebsd/tmp >>> >>> took over three minutes. It should have taken about three /seconds/. >>> >>> "uptime" reported a load average of around 1.00. >>> "top" showed no threads (user or kernel) using CPU. >>> "iostat" showed an average of less than 20 tps on ada0. >>> "rm" was usually in the RUN state. > We are looking at something similar. Would you be able to try to > reproduce it using a kernel with: > > nooptions SCHED_ULE > options SCHED_4BSD > > to see if it makes a difference? It seems to, but the problem is > inconsistent enough that I can't be sure. The 4BSD scheduler does //not// exhibit this problem. I tested with the latest releng/9.2 (r254054) and an otherwise GENERIC config. Eric