From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Oct 22 15:46:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF92C1DC48 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476DE764 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FE9EEE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.254.158.238]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id u9MFkVvu053189 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:46:31 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id u9MFkRmd066060 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 17:46:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u9MFkF0S057642 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 17:46:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201610221546.u9MFkF0S057642@fire.js.berklix.net> cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:40:30 -0000." Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 17:46:15 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:46:37 -0000 Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > On 22/10/2016 11:31, Alphons van Werven wrote: > > andrew clarke wrote: > > > >> Is this the first time a port has been deleted for being "offensive"? > > There used to be "offensive" (a term to be taken rather loosely in this > > case) fortune cookies, but they got kicked out somewhere in 9.X. That was > > the base system though; not the ports tree. > > > > Come to think of it, I'm quite (be it pleasantly) surprised to see that > > deskutils/hot-babe is still allowed. I'm still half waiting for someone > > with misguided delusions of moral superiority to delete that port, thinking > > it's their decision to make that FreeBSD must not enable people to display > > their system load as a cartoon woman in various stages of undress. Or > > something along those lines. But I digress... > > > > Anyway, if anyone misses this port, I'll be happy to maintain it privately > > and make it available from a public repository, if only because I strongly > > oppose censorship, so I would gladly help circumvent what I consider to be > > a hopelessly outdated and even morally wrong concept. > > > > Fonz > > > > Could you maybe have a separate category in ports, called "uncensored" > or something? We are all adults and can take care of ourselves, can't we? misc/jive is in 4.11-RELEASE 6.4-RELEASE 9.2-RELEASE 9.3-RELEASE 10.3-RELEASE, https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/2016Q3/misc/jive/Makefile?view=log Censorship is offensive. Censor the offensive Censor: remove his/her commit bit. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes