From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 31 00:17:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417A8C11; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17AC02EBE; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.26.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80C3435A3; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:16:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5271A160.8050309@marino.st> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:16:32 +0100 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jason E. Hale" Subject: Re: svn commit: r332099 - head/devel/cssc/files References: <201310301246.r9UCkiWu069471@svn.freebsd.org> <52710244.3040708@marino.st> <2602741.QmfnMIAQrR@mocha.verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <2602741.QmfnMIAQrR@mocha.verizon.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:17:08 -0000 On 10/31/2013 00:23, Jason E. Hale wrote: > Sorry, I guess my working copy was a little out of sync. The patch submitted > by the maintainer does ultimately include . I ran build tests > before committing it, so I can confirm that it works. If you don't mind, I'll > just delete your patch so we don't have two patches for the same file. A lot of these tests are flawed I've found (false passes). However, if the maintainer patch contains , I'm happy. Feel free to remove the patch I added. John