From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 15 23:15:09 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E42E16A418
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:15:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289F113C458
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:15:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org)
Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhZ9K-0002g8-Eh
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:15:02 +0000
Received: from p57b1b4d2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.177.180.210])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:15:02 +0000
Received: from mneumann by p57b1b4d2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim
	0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:15:02 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
From: Michael Neumann <mneumann@ntecs.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:08:33 +0200
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <4713F2F1.4090608@ntecs.de>
References: <48344.172.16.9.1.1192472836.squirrel@www.xtra-net.be>
	<200710151335.27991.fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57b1b4d2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070723)
In-Reply-To: <200710151335.27991.fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:53:54 +0000
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Xen Status : FreeBSD-current as Dom/U.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:15:09 -0000

Freddie Cash schrieb:
> On October 15, 2007 11:27 am Vincent Blondel wrote:
>> I am trying to install FreeBSD-current as Dom/U on my Core2 Quad server
>> hosting Linux Ubuntu 7.10 as Dom/0.
> 
> Is that a quad-core CPU or a quad-CPU system?
> 
> If it's a quad-core CPU, it should support Intel hardware virtualisation 
> feature.  If it does, you don't need any Xen patches or support in 
> FreeBSD.  Just create a Xen VM that supports hardware virtualisation (not 
> a paravirtualised VM) and install FreeBSD as per normal.  That's the 
> beauty of the Intel VT and AMD VX (or whatever they call it now) 
> features -- no need to patch an OS to run in a Xen VM.

Does anybody know if there are big differences in performance
of running an unchanged OS under Xen with hardware virtualization turned on vs.
a paravirtualized OS? Or any other problems with an unchanged OS using hardware 
virtualization? If not, then this is clearly the way to go!

Regards,

   Michael