From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 16 06:15:59 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C1116A4DD
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:15:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-er5.mbrd.ru [194.117.71.33])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFDE43D9B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:15:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.33.193])
	by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1GDEga-000M6Z-Qm; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:15:28 +0400
Message-ID: <44E2B800.2000205@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:15:28 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stanislav Sedov <ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru>
References: <ebsorm$1s02$1@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw>	<44E218A7.8020505@bellsouth.net>
	<20060815231002.6bca0c83@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20060815231002.6bca0c83@localhost>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: B Briggs <rcbdyndns@bellsouth.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: devel/fam build failure
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:15:59 -0000

Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> They are merely two different implementations of FAM subsystem: one
> from SGI, another from RedHat. I belive, that SGI's one is sligthly
> faster currently. Also, it covers standard completely contradictory to
> gamin.

Does any of them use kqueue(2)?

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.