From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 16 06:15:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C1116A4DD for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-er5.mbrd.ru [194.117.71.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFDE43D9B for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:15:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.33.193]) by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1GDEga-000M6Z-Qm; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:15:28 +0400 Message-ID: <44E2B800.2000205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:15:28 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <44E218A7.8020505@bellsouth.net> <20060815231002.6bca0c83@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060815231002.6bca0c83@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: B Briggs , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/fam build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 06:15:59 -0000 Stanislav Sedov wrote: > They are merely two different implementations of FAM subsystem: one > from SGI, another from RedHat. I belive, that SGI's one is sligthly > faster currently. Also, it covers standard completely contradictory to > gamin. Does any of them use kqueue(2)? -- Dixi. Sem.