Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:52:54 +0100 From: Arjan van Leeuwen <avleeuwen@piwebs.com> To: tom <tom@www.paniert.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnome2 port Message-ID: <200311181352.54323.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> In-Reply-To: <1069119831.3fb9795788cb1@www.paniert.net> References: <1069021442.3fb7f902194ed@www.paniert.net> <1069101939.737.52.camel@gyros> <1069119831.3fb9795788cb1@www.paniert.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_mYhu/L6AlsK6tRs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 18 November 2003 02:43, tom wrote: > hi me again, > somehow the gnome2 port sucks.... i did as u suggested. cvsupped again ( > didn=B4t do a rebuild) but had fortunately a rcs source by hand... now it > hangs with quite another compile problem: You shouldn't be so quick to say that the gnome2 port sucks, it seems to wo= rk=20 for everyone here except you. You had to edit a rcs source by hand... this= =20 means that the gnome2 port doesn't suck, but your ports tree does. It has=20 stale patches in there. I'd suggest to delete the whole thing (/usr/ports/*= )=20 and cvsup to get it right. Best regards, Arjan --Boundary-02=_mYhu/L6AlsK6tRs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/uhYm3Ym57eNCXiERAkNQAJkB76k2zgNdiyauccKvNETEJrKB9gCfbWq7 pC2Er9Y2g4i4hJxD6X7r0pU= =dd2O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_mYhu/L6AlsK6tRs--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311181352.54323.avleeuwen>