From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 20:28:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780F737B401 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A894B43FE0 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:28:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h5A3StAQ089565 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:28:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)h5A3StkF089562 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:28:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:28:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030609232818.V56112@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: nge in GENERIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 03:28:57 -0000 Hi, I noticed that nge doesn't figure in GENERIC. Is this done on purpose? Regards, > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >