From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 06:25:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DC016A401 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 06:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C2B13C461 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 06:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HPC4G-00015V-Ag for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:25:36 +0100 Received: from e177223020.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.177.223.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:25:36 +0100 Received: from rotkap by e177223020.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:25:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:25:21 +0100 Organization: yes Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <2lm2c4-1h1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <45EF0778.9080400@FreeBSD.org> <20070307210236.GA27709@voodoo.bawue.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e177223020.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O Subject: Re: Whats this: UPDATING 2007030 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rotkap@gmx.de List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:25:39 -0000 Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:42:00PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >> Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> > >> > sorry I do not understand, WHAT to do there. >> > >> > Okay, there is an example, but what doas this mean concretely to me? >> > >> > Does that mean, that I am responsible fu"r all deps in ports? >> > That cannot be? is it? >> > >> >> I think you can just ignore it if you don't understand. It's safe in the >> case. Do not run pkgdb -L. Dependencies will restore after a few upgrades. > > Hmm, it seems portupgrade-devel is broken eg: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The entry in UPDATING was about portupgrade-devel? Not portupgrade "normal" Heino