Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:08:52 -0500 From: Greg Larkin <glarkin@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/websh Makefile Message-ID: <4D63DF94.1080209@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110222154854.GA18003@lonesome.com> References: <201102220418.p1M4Idj6063729@repoman.freebsd.org> <4D63B796.3080406@FreeBSD.org> <20110222154854.GA18003@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/22/11 10:48 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:18:14AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote: >> Is it a good idea to decrement PORTREVISION after the previous commit >> has been in the tree for some number of hours? > > Nope. For instance, if a pointyhat run _had_ been started during that > window, the uploaded package would now be wrong. > > mcl What's the proper fix at this point - rebump to current PORTREVISION+2, or is a PORTEPOCH bump required? Thank you, Greg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1j35QACgkQ0sRouByUApADAwCgzP5GIibqwO9Vq27OfpLO8ZXR jSQAoK/LJteMVb3ztlPnDNQpj+L6Sl9v =hm88 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D63DF94.1080209>