From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Feb 10 15:32:45 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA17997
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 15:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wa3ymh.transsys.com (#6@wa3ymh.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.42])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA17991
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 15:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wa3ymh.transsys.com (#6@localhost.TransSys.COM [127.0.0.1]) by wa3ymh.transsys.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA09404; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:32:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199602102332.SAA09404@wa3ymh.transsys.com>
To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, current@freebsd.org
From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:56:41 EST."
             <9602102156.AA12462@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:32:12 -0500
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> <<On Fri, 09 Feb 1996 20:36:42 -0700, Warner Losh <imp@village.org> said:
> 
> > I'm not sure what the exact interoperability status is.  To date I've
> > just usered our version to access machines that are running our
> > version.  I've heard conflicting things about eBones vs KerberosIV.
> 
> I have not had any interoperability difficulty between FreeBSD's
> eBones and real, honest-to-God MIT Kerberos v4.

Nor have I had any interoperability problems between FreeBSD's eBones
(both 2.1R and now 2.2-960130-SNAP) and the Cynus "version" of
Kerberos.  Works great.

louie