From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Nov 6 9:12:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-27-149-77.mmcable.com [24.27.149.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2BFC37B4C5 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:12:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 51683 invoked by uid 100); 6 Nov 2000 17:12:40 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14854.59016.102289.635909@guru.mired.org> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:12:40 -0600 (CST) To: John Galt Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unix In-Reply-To: <95598882@toto.iv> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Galt types: > http://www.sco.com/offers/ancient.html > BSD is NOT Unix, nor has it been since the AT&T suit. Unix is a > trademark, and a BSD variant is not very likely to get rights to use > it... I'd say "BSD can NOT be called Unix". The stuff I used to run under an AT&T Unix license looks more like FreeBSD than it looks like anything I know of that it is currently legal to call Unix. You figure Caldera would lighten up just to get some extra press, but that all seems to be going to Linux anyway, so I guess Elvis has left the building.