From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 26 16:43:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2079D16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leticia.terra.com.br (leticia.terra.com.br [200.154.55.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D576243D1D for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:43:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from suporte@wahtec.com.br) Received: from paramonga.terra.com.br (paramonga.terra.com.br [200.154.55.133]) by leticia.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC393CBD6 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:43:13 -0300 (BRT) Received: from wahottisray (unknown [200.96.65.150]) (authenticated user arisjr) by paramonga.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D56D3C015 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:43:13 -0300 (BRT) From: "Aristeu Gil Alves Jr" To: "Freebsd-Stable" Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:43:39 -0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: ipfilter/ipfw + bridge + out checking X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:43:16 -0000 Hi all. I didn't find any thread discussing it, sorry if I am re-posting the same subject. Is there a way to check the ipfilter/ipfw out-flow with bridge? Is it implemented already? The case ilustrated in most howtos is shown with only two NICs NET-1 || ___________ |bridge-fw| ----------- || NET-2 It's important for us to use a bridge-fw with three NICs. NET-1 || ___________ |bridge-fw|== NET-3 ----------- || NET-2 without the out packet controling, a solution with three or more NIC's could lead to an information leak problem. I've heard this checking is not done due a performance issue (it's writen in ipf-howto), but performance is not the main goal in this particular situation. I would like to have the stateful firewall and the bridge _fully_ working together. If there's anything I can do to contribute, I'll be happy to help. []'s --aristeu