From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 15:32:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0881116A4CE; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:32:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8C243D2D; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:32:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4815165218; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 67609-02-12; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9138A65216; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:09 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AD8476150; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040622153207.GB1961@empiric.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, dwmalone@FreeBSD.org, fenner@FreeBSD.org, wietse@porcupine.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline cc: fenner@FreeBSD.org cc: dwmalone@FreeBSD.org cc: wietse@porcupine.org Subject: tcp_wrappers: accumulated change-request PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:32:26 -0000 Hi all, Whilst scanning GNATS, I found a number of PRs relating to requests for tcp_wrappers functionality and some outright bugfixes. Rather than commit these as-is, I think we should push the changes back to Wietse, as we maintain tcp_wrappers on a vendor branch. The PRs in question are: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/31034 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32808 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/36556 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/42336 What does everyone else think? Regards, BMS