From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 21:34:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709B51065673 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f183.google.com (mail-qy0-f183.google.com [209.85.221.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B498FC1D for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so1852957qyk.9 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:34:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=aYKp42tsMka+QI3CfKgwOuz6x5NoTaUwEoejrndCvO4=; b=xgLq/rnvuz0IkKttnSPlMgtjGfnqZ1HBOz2xe+XlocZTlvE0EnFCbheg/1h7gT7EMq Kcc0xxRDyv3qMUpO5ifBHRRfH1q9AIBgrE9eAJAp3AmtN/26nN6PEgXFF1bY/jvpfbkY PpC3Ye8VBwU2zOLmtga74mbqOB6/iKS9USkVQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=wEnni3YILRGxmFRVF47Bkued+ksk5SdfBqOBWNrZnk6uPXsx+d9bQrpFRqN9GZ+HvG QM5Bo5JBmbMtJIfLIcM3Vfsjlbw8Hzoc8r84m61ue5NnW+0uYD5WHv1PTyRFZ41aqtDz qHqt2f6g+41dIoUiMGxFRgOUIf4rFsq7brJxE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.58.168 with SMTP id g40mr504270qah.93.1267652076148; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:34:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B8D3016.2070301@feral.com> References: <3bbf2fe11002281655i61a5f0a0if3f381ad0c4a1ef8@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe11003020724m14bebf74y9fa3906418b7cf11@mail.gmail.com> <4B8D3016.2070301@feral.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:34:36 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4d6b1edb7ddcea81 Message-ID: <3bbf2fe11003031334g4591c1a3lc52dfb898f728ee2@mail.gmail.com> From: Attilio Rao To: Matthew Jacob Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How is supposed to be protected the units list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:34:40 -0000 2010/3/2 Matthew Jacob : > I will admit to not looking at this stuff closely. But I'll also test with > this today and give back an opinion. > I would really like to hear Scott, Ken, Alexander or Justin express an > opinion on this. So I stress-tested the patch for several hours (6-7) with a stress-test that could reproduce the bug for us, on a debugging kernel, and it didn't panic'ed or showed LORs, deadlock, etc. If someone could offer time for reviews or futher examinations it would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein