From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec  3 23:42:45 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4730A16A41F
	for <openoffice@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  3 Dec 2005 23:42:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
	[128.131.111.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C803743D58
	for <openoffice@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  3 Dec 2005 23:42:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from [128.131.111.48] (pulcherrima [128.131.111.48])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730AC13788;
	Sun,  4 Dec 2005 00:42:43 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 00:42:39 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051203.171107.74666553.chat95@mac.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0512040039200.92900@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <20051203.171107.74666553.chat95@mac.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: GCJ/GIJ OOo status
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 23:42:45 -0000

On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, NAKATA Maho wrote:
> I updated my blog entry and ask for your help.
> with gcc-4.1-20051125, in terms of compilation, there are a
> lot of improvements. However, gij seems to have a bug but gcj
> seems to work perfectly, i think this is a FreeBSD specific issue.

Unfortunately, we'll have to disable the libjava builds with the next 
update of the gcc41 port that I'm going to commit shortly since building 
libjava now consumes insane amounts of memory.

(See <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00046.html>.)

Can you also reproduce this problem, if you enable libgcj again?

Gerald
-- 
Gerald (Jerry) Pfeifer   gerald@pfeifer.com   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/