From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 16 20:20:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BDA106564A for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9328FC0A for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p8GKJlWZ045689; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:19:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1316204387; bh=t6vfRIwdiNh1O5gQcFc5VaZzmgQ8N22Cm4N5yfNwPMk=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=g/tPmcv3CJtw1KFbChJKUD9PdEyvxmqxEDDunnnlMOkec1VQv/MYexvLqPh9C0OjJ ruydZgSzRG+ZNkyXzRdJ8tPOyoS4ag3o414sESTdNNz0xixzhfshiiZSXvXuGwwlfJ OCNNQIJO1wE72+BoJe7qle2ZfDFbMqSOTCbm+uHE= From: Sean Bruno To: "Justin T. Gibbs" In-Reply-To: <4E6E978C.5060608@scsiguy.com> References: <4E6E978C.5060608@scsiguy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:19:46 -0700 Message-ID: <1316204386.2551.6.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH] Netfront fixes for FreeBSD-head X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:20:21 -0000 On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 16:36 -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > Folks, > > I'm planning to ask RE for permission to merge the following netfront > fixes (listed below) into 9.0/head. Before I do so, I'd appreciate some > community testing on the proposed patch set (attached). The main areas > of concern are: > > o TSO/LRO and performance > o Compatibility with NetBSD and other Dom0s that lack sg or TSO/LRO > support. > o Compatibility with configurations enabling ioemu on an interface. > > Thanks, > Justin Ok, I've got ref9-xen64 and ref9-xen32 up and running and it looks good for a smoke test. I need to come up with a regression suite that will update these images and boot up to do "stuff and things" at some point. If project committer's want access here, you should be able to log in and poke around. "root" access via kerberos is totally available, but has to be cleared by clusteradm@ first. FreeBSD ref9-xen64.freebsd.org 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #2 r225561M: Wed Sep 14 14:37:48 PDT 2011 sbruno@ref9-xen64.freebsd.org:/dumpster/scratch/sbruno-scratch/test/sys/amd64/compile/XENHVM amd64 FreeBSD ref9-xen32.freebsd.org 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #0 r225561M: Wed Sep 14 15:41:40 PDT 2011 sbruno@ref9-xen32.freebsd.org:/dumpster/scratch/sbruno-scratch/test/sys/i386/compile/XEN i386