From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Oct 9 19:07:19 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A9312BEBE for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46pNxz2bYhz3MfD for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 58DC212BEBD; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A1012BEBB for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46pNxz1dLGz3MfB for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B60E1D015 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x99J7IDj064843 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:07:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x99J7IV6064842 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 19:07:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241118] [boot] 12.1-BETA3 installer hangs before loader menu Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:07:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ryan@freqlabs.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:07:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241118 --- Comment #11 from Ryan Moeller --- r346844 - No loader, kernel visible r346774 - No loader, kernel visible On a hunch I tried the r346638 image from CI and that doesn't boot, it's ju= st a blank screen, even though the disc1.iso for that revision did work. The r34= 0154 image from CI is about as far back as history goes there, and it falls in t= he "doesn't show anything until the kernel" bucket. I tried the CI image for r346638 again on a different USB drive and this ti= me it still didn't show the loader, but the kernel did boot with a faint font. Same issue again I guess. I tested the r346638 disc1.iso I had again, it turns out that UEFI booting works correctly, but legacy booting it exhibits the same problems as the CI images all have (they're all legacy boot only). That's a relief, for a minu= te I was worried the CI images had the console set to comconsole or something. I confirmed there is no loader.conf or boot.config forcing weird settings on = the CI images, to be sure. So vidconsole at least has been broken on stable/12 for quite a while it se= ems, but that must not be related to the UEFI boot issue. Fun fun fun. I can't really narrow it down any further without starting to build my own images. I do need to do other things with this machine for the rest of the day, so that will have to wait. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=